Elliott Management, a US-based activist hedge fund, has privately encouraged SSE to split its energy businesses for weeks. However, a new letter marks the first public insight into the debate that followed SSE’s announcement of a $16.8bn plan to become the world’s leading offshore wind farm constructor.

Portfolio managers at the hedge fund wrote to SSE chairman John Manzoni to propose the split. Estimating SSE’s renewable assets to be worth £21 per share, the investment firm believes that SSE could generate an additional £5bn from a potential split; 30% of the company’s value.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

The letter also urged the company to create a new, detailed plan to “address investor concern around SSE’s corporate governance, its ability to fund its growth in the long term, and its persistent undervaluation”.

As part of this, the hedge fund also urged SSE to appoint two independent directors to its board. It called SSE’s recently announced investment plan “lacklustre”, and the review process that formulated it “opaque”. It also said that the company’s separation from its networks business should have “more ambition”.

The hedge fund’s letter blamed the perceived “persistent undervaluation” on current chief executive Alistair Phillips-Davies. In response, Phillips-Davies called SSE’s plans came from a “rigorous” review and presented “the optimal pathway to accelerate clean growth, lead the energy transition, and create value for all shareholders”.

A spokesperson for Elliott Management said that the company was a “top five” shareholder in SSE. Previously, the hedge fund has encouraged a change in the management of pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline and forced a deal around Twitter’s governance.

The news follows German energy leader RWE facing similar calls from another activist investor earlier this week. In a letter to RWE management dated 3 December, investment fund Enkraft encouraged the company to separate from its brown coal division. The company recently published a $56.6bn investment plan, but Enkraft claimed that RWE leaders “fail to recognise the great strategic and economic importance of this issue for all RWE stakeholders”.

Both of these moves mimic follow Engine Number One’s high-profile defeat of ExxonMobil’s board earlier this year. At the company’s annual general meeting, the activist investor won a vote to install two new board members, despite the sitting board’s advice to vote against the proposal.