Many of the world’s largest copper deposits are in the driest regions on earth. This triggers complex and competing demands, including the need to minimise water usage, use less energy, and reduce CO2 emissions,” says Saleem Varghese, Copper Growth Lead – Worley. “However, an adjustment to any one of these factors can put the others out of balance.”

The interdependency of the water mines require and the energy needed to enable operations is called the water-energy nexus. And how miners address these interrelated elements will have a major impact on their ability to fill the looming copper supply deficit.

So, what options can copper miners explore to reduce water and energy consumption, without putting their copper production targets and profitability at risk?

Copper production uses a lot of water

Copper extraction typically requires vast quantities of fresh water. In 2016, USGS estimated that 5,300 gigalitres of water – 10 times the amount of water in the Sydney harbour – was used to extract 20.1 million tonnes of copper globally.

“This large water requirement is why mining operations and other industries compete for increasingly scarce water resources,” says Varghese.

“It’s critical to look to more sustainable use and reuse of water. Miners will likely need to change their approach to processing materials. And they’ll also need to embrace new digital technologies to better understand the water-energy nexus and optimise the recovery of important materials.”

With existing technologies and approaches, processing more materials requires more water and more energy. But this isn’t the only dynamic impacting copper production.

Falling head grades are making the problem worse

As a general trend, copper grades are falling. This means miners need to process more material out of the earth, which generates more waste tailings, to produce the same amount of finished metal.

“To recover this lower grade material, ore often needs to be ground to a smaller particle size to liberate the valuable minerals from the gangue material,” says Varghese.

“This not only requires more energy, but it’s also harder to separate and recycle water from the process due to the larger wetted surface area. This results in more water lost to tailings storage facilities, which can’t be reused.”  

The mining sector has sought to reduce its impact by minimising its reliance on fresh water sources. In drier regions like Chile, miners are turning to large desalination plants to source usable water from seawater and other sources. This trend is best illustrated by desalination plants in operation and under construction to support the Chilean mining sector.

“The challenge is, the energy intensity of desalination can be in direct opposition to their decarbonisation goals, if powered by fossil fuels,” says Varghese. “This is the heart of the water-energy nexus. Solving one problem, can halt progress on another. And that’s why seeing the full picture across the metal production process is so important.”

Creating options with water modelling

As Andrew Campbell, Senior Director for Sustainability & Climate Adaption at Worley explains the value of water modelling begins at the conceptual phase of a mining project.

“Our aim is to present the different options for sourcing, using and recycling water – at different points in the life of a mine – so our customers can weigh up what solutions work best for them,” says Campbell.

“We’re often exploring options for a mine with too much water one day, and then a different mine that’s millions of litres short of water the next. That’s why there isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution that finds the right balance at every site.”

But Campbell sees a consistent trend across every mining project: the need to be responsible with water.

“Any opportunity to reduce water consumption – and therefore use less energy to source it – is worth considering in a dry region like the Atacama Desert in Chile.

“Given the harshness of these environments, our modelling usually finds large variances in the capital and operating costs of different water management options. But we often find that when you consider the entire life of a mine, more capital-expensive options at the outset can save a lot of water, costs and CO2 emissions as the mine ages. And this is when energy costs, water availability and other constraints are likely to even more pressing.

“That’s why our mining customers are particularly interested in water management solutions that look beyond the business as usual.”

Exploring less water-intensive approaches to tailings management

Water lost to tailings is a key contributor to the water intensity of mine sites. As new approaches to tailings management emerge, the way miners handle their waste material could significantly impact the viability of their operations.

A recent paper published in Applied Energy titled ‘Use of real options to enhance water-energy nexus in mine tailings management’, evaluated the water-energy nexus in copper mines using a water reduction model. It focused on mine tailings facilities and water supply to the mine site to find trade-offs between water and energy.

“The paper showed that reuse of water, by using dewatering technologies, could improve the water-energy nexus by reducing energy consumption,” says Varghese. “The higher cost of these dewatering technologies was offset by the reduced cost of water retreatment and transport.

“The paper also illustrated that in certain circumstances, an emerging approach to tailings management called dry stacking can be economically viable to reduce water consumption and associated energy use. And it’s likely to be an appealing option in more places as filter technologies mature and come down the cost curve.”

The advantages of a dry stack approach to tailings

Dry stacking refers to an emerging technique where miners filter their liquid waste material from the mining process, recover as much water as possible, and then stack this dry waste material into landforms on site.

“This differs from the most common method for storing tailings today, where wet tailings are deposited behind a raised embankment,” Varghese explains. “In this traditional approach, the solids in the tailings slurry will settle to the base of the impoundment over time, allowing miners to recover some water from the surface and re-use it.

“The challenge is conventional impoundments lose a lot of water to the environment through evaporation and seepage. They also represent a significant closure liability for mine operators,” Varghese continues.

“Wet tailings facilities are challenging to rehabilitate because it’s difficult to manage a wet and soft tailings deposit. The potential impoundment wall integrity failings and evolving closure requirements can also result in tailings material needing to be rehandled and relocated at excessive cost, particularly at a time when the mine is no longer producing revenue.”

While usually more expensive upfront, the dry stack approach overcomes the many of the challenges of wet tailings as the mine matures.

“It allows for greater water recovery and reuse,” explains Varghese. “This reduces how much water you need to pump to a water-stressed mine site, which usually means lower energy consumption and costs. As the cost and impact of both water and energy changes, we are seeing the water-energy nexus shift over time to the point where increased onsite recycling makes sense.”

Removing more water from tailings through dry stacking also improves the stability of the deposited tailings, which helps to mitigate fluidisation and dam failure risks.

“Wet tailings storage represents one of the greatest material risks for most mining companies,” Varghese says. “It’s a liability that is highly scrutinised by investors and more society broadly. Investor and public expectations around tailings are increasing, so this trend matters to miners as they consider their life of asset tailings management and closure strategies. Aiming for higher than today’s minimum regulatory standard could help offset large closure costs in the future.”    

Selecting the right approach

While the water-energy nexus analysed in the ‘Use of real options to enhance water-energy nexus in mine tailings management’ paper highlighted the potential benefits of dry stack tailings, the water-energy nexus should be considered on a site-by-site basis.

Characteristics such as location, elevation, water sources, energy costs, ore properties, and weather conditions will all impact the water-energy nexus for a given site and the viability of different technologies, ultimately impacting what an optimised system solution may look like.    

“That’s why water modelling – using sophisticated simulation tools – is an important starting point to assess the potential options, capture the unique risks, quantify them and assess mitigation strategies,” says Varghese.

“These options, including emerging approaches to tailings management such as dry stacking, can help miners determine the best mix of water-energy usage for their unique constraints, so they can continue to flourish in an increasingly challenging operating environment.”

Further details:

In their From Ambition to Reality series, Worley proposes five key shifts in thinking about and approaching projects on the road to net zero. Download the whitepaper, below, to find out more.